|
Author:ZHAO
HONGRUI
With continued economic growth expected over
the next decade in China, basic infrastructure
will remain one of the most attractive areas for
domestic and foreign investors.
Construction of roads, especially toll roads,
has become a lucrative business. Returns on investments,
in most cases, are guaranteed by the steadily
flowing revenues from fees paid by motorists.
The Road Law of China, promulgated in 1997 by
the Standing Committee of the National People's
Congress, or China's parliament, formally recognized
toll roads and granted investors, whether domestic
or foreign, the right to charge fees.
The law, in essence, gives investors the incentive
to participate in the sector.
As road construction takes a relatively long
time and requires huge funding, diverse financial
sources - such as government investments, bank
loans, stock or corporate bond issues and allowing
investors to charge tolls - must be found.
Investors select the financial vehicle after
assessing the project's merits, analysing the
financial cost of each funding source and examining
legal and policy restrictions.
Based on our experience, financial leasing could
be a new funding vehicle in certain cases. It
could be more practical and/or less expensive
than other funding sources.
A basic form of financial leasing used in road
financing is the so-called sale-and-lease-back
system, which has been recognized by China in
numerous laws and administrative regulations.
The funding source was defined in the "Measures
Concerning the Administration of Financial Lease
Companies," issued by the People's Bank of
China, as a form of financial lease in which a
person sells the items he owns to another and
then leases them back after signing a contract.
The person, as seller/leasee, realizes his/her
fixed assets; the other party, as purchaser/leaser,
receives profits from rent on a regular basis.
Such arrangements may prove especially useful
for a company operating a road but is searching
for funds.
Chinese laws allow investors in toll roads to
transfer their fee-collection rights to a third
parties to recover their investments, which could
otherwise take years to recoup.
Many road companies have used this system.
The third parties, however, are prohibited from
transferring the franchise rights to others.
That prohibition is outlined in Article 26 of
the "Measures Concerning the Non-free Transfer
of Road Operative Rights" issued in 1996
by the Ministry of Communications.
The third parties must turn to other funding
sources when trying to raise money for road construction.
Bank loans could be an ideal funding source,
especially since interest rates have been falling
in recent years.
Other obstacles exist that might not necessarily
fall under Chinese law.
For instance, domestic banks often impose on
borrowers a wide range of use restrictions on
loans. The banks often are critical of credit
standing.
The tightening of bank credit in recent years
has compounded the issue. Also, domestic banks
generally are reluctant to grant loans to companies
from other regions.
For example, a Beijing-based bank might be hesitant
to extend a loan to a Shanghai-based firm.
The banks, plagued by bad loans, might be justified,
as they are trying to minimize risks. But they
are squeezing funding channels.
Regarding stock or corporate bond issues, there
could be many more legal and policy restrictions,
and costs of funding could be very high.
A third party might be able to avoid such restrictions
and raise funds through sales-and-lease-back system.
Based on our experience, a road company may
sell its fixed assets to a financial lease company,
and then lease them back.
The road company pays rent regularly to the
leaser, with the franchise right as pledge.
Property listed in the fixed assets is transferred
back to the road company when the lease expires.
The road company receives low-cost funding almost
immediately, and avoids restrictions over the
transferral of the franchise right.
Financial lease companies are more inclined
than domestic banks to participate in this funding
mechanism, as they are less locally focused and
face fewer legal and policy restrictions.
Also, financial lease companies' interests are
largely secured by their holding the property
in the leased items rather than by third party
guarantees.
Given the nature of such financial arrangements,
financial lease companies are unlikely to get
involved when the roads are being constructed.
Road construction projects are generally supported
by loans or direct investments.
The author is a partner in Beijing-based Zhong
Sheng Law Firm.
[下一篇] |